King v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Daviess Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Miller
Eeversing.
The appellants, Dave King and Edith King, were found guilty of maintaining a common public nuisance in Owensboro, and each of them was fined $37.50. The nuisance consisted in the keeping of a bawdy house on *830Mulberry street in tbe city of Owensboro. Tbe circuit judge entered a judgment upon tbe verdict; awarded a capias pro fine, and further ordered and directed the defendants to abate said nuisance within five days and to keep it abated, and to cease keeping a bawdy house at said place, or anywhere in the city of Owensboro. The judgment further…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ehrlick v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Ches. & Ohio R. R. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
- Seifried v. HaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1883
- Leitchfield Mercantile Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Commonwealth v. T. J. Megibben Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Phoenix Amusement Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Marshal! v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Adams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
- Cook v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- State v. GreenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.