Legal Opinion

Ireland v. Riley

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1935No. Civ. 5550PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Action to enjoin the defendant, State Controller, from drawing a warrant in payment of the price of certain stamps alleged to have been illegally contracted for by the State Board of Equalization. The defendants had judgment, and the plaintiff appeals.

The question presented for determination is as follows: Has the State Board of Equalization, under section 33 of chapter 330 of the Laws of 1935, power to enter into a valid contract for the printing and purchasing of liquor excise stamps, without first obtaining the approval of the state department of finance, as provided for in section 675 (a)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BrewerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. County of Inyo v. HessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Niceley v. County of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Lillywhite v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Tirapelle v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Treu v. KirkwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Diamond International Corp. v. BoasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. In Re ZadroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API