Legal Opinion

Howell v. Baker

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 8, 1930PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This bill seeks to restrain the prosecution of a suit at law brought by the defendant John L. Baker against the complainant to recover the sum of $2,253.35, representing a deficiency judgment entered against Baker in a foreclosure suit in Florida and for which he alleges the complainant is liable; and, also, to fix and determine the rights and liabilities of the complainant and of all the parties defendant to this suit with respect to such deficiency judgment. This controversy arises out of the following state of facts:

In January, 1925, the defendant John L. Baker, with two associates,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Green v. StoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  2. Phifer v. AbbottSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. Biddle v. PughNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1900
  4. Klapworth v. DresslerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1860
  5. Pruden v. WilliamsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1875

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ray v. Beneficial Fin. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  2. Cataldo Constr. Co. v. County of EssexNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  3. Boorstein v. MillerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
  4. Dencer v. ErbNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  5. Panco v. RogersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API