Legal Opinion

Lombardo v. City of Dallas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 20, 1932No. 11163PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLooney, J.

V. A. Lombardo owned a lot located within the bounds of a dwelling district established by ordinance adopted by the city of Dallas in pursuance of authority granted cities and incorporated villages by an act of the Fortieth Legislature (chapter 283 [Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. arts. lOlla-UOllj]), known as “the City Zoning Law,” and made formal application to the' building inspector of the city, for permission to erect a building on the lot, to be used as a gasoline filling and oil station. The inspector denied the application on the ground that the zoning ordinance prohibited such use in a…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. City of Aurora v. BurnsIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lombardo v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Connor v. City of University ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Kiges v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. City of Corpus Christi v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. City of Dallas v. LivelyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API