Legal Opinion

Ditmers v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 1917No. 20,709PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Neosho district court; James W. Finney, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by ’

WEST, J.:

In defense to plaintiff’s suit to quiet title defendant Hurt set up two tax deeds. The second was by the court held void but the defendant was not given his taxes. He appeals. The deed dated September 4, 1915, is void for the reason that it does not show the quantity of the • land bid for by the purchaser as the statute requires. (Gen. Stat. 1915, § 11452.) The recital is:

“. . . having offered to pay the sum of one dollar and 99 cents, being the whole amount of taxes, interest and costs then due and remaining unpaid on said property, for . .…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davidson v. TimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. McDonough v. MertenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  3. Wagner v. UnderhillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  4. Miller v. DitlingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Baldwin v. GibsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Canaj, Inc. v. Baker and Division Phase IIICourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API