Ditmers v. Rogers
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Neosho district court; James W. Finney, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by ’
WEST, J.:
In defense to plaintiff’s suit to quiet title defendant Hurt set up two tax deeds. The second was by the court held void but the defendant was not given his taxes. He appeals. The deed dated September 4, 1915, is void for the reason that it does not show the quantity of the • land bid for by the purchaser as the statute requires. (Gen. Stat. 1915, § 11452.) The recital is:
“. . . having offered to pay the sum of one dollar and 99 cents, being the whole amount of taxes, interest and costs then due and remaining unpaid on said property, for . .…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davidson v. TimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- McDonough v. MertenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
- Wagner v. UnderhillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Miller v. DitlingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Baldwin v. GibsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Canaj, Inc. v. Baker and Division Phase IIICourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006