Legal Opinion

Miller v. Ditlinger

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 6, 1909No. 15,760PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Norton district court; William H. Pratt, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

Agnes and Maggie Miller recovered a judgment quieting their title to a tract of land against the claims of Nicholas Ditlinger, who appeals.

In 1888 James, the owner at that time, mortgaged the land to the United States Investment Company. By successive sales, assignments in blank and deliveries this mortgage became the property of Lendall Titcomb sometime prior to 1890. None of the assignments was recorded. In October, 1890, James conveyed the land to his mortgagee, the United States Investment Company, and the deed was duly recorded. Sometime…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Redden v. TefftSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  2. Wagner v. UnderhillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Park v. EnsignSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. Kitchell v. HodgenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. McDonald v. KelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davidson v. TimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Guzzi v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Baldwin v. GibsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Ditmers v. RogersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API