Legal Opinion

Pekin Plow Co. v. Wilson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1902No. 12,136PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from the district court for Lancaster county. Replevin action, by the Pekin Plow Company against Frank E. Parks. Claude S. Wilson, as trustee in bankruptcy of defendant, intervened. On trial the nisi-prius judge directed a verdict for defendant, which direction by the court is assigned as error. Tried below before Frost, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Oldham, 0.

This was an action in replevin originally instituted by the plaintiff, Pekin Plow Company, against the defendant Frank E. Parks, a retail dealer in farm machinery at Lincoln, Nebraska. During the pendency of the action the defendant Parks was adjudged a bankrupt and the defendant Claude S. Wilson was permitted to intervene and defend the action as trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of Frank E. Parks. At the conclusion of the testimony offered in the court below the trial judge directed a verdict for defendant, and plaintiff brings error to this court.

The action of the trial court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kimball v. SilversMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Grand View Building Ass'n v. Northern Assurance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Krinsky v. Stevens Coal Sales Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. First National Bank of McCook v. HullNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Omaha Furniture & Carpet Co. v. MeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API