Legal Opinion
First National Bank of McCook v. Hull
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 1973No. 38224PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNewton, J.
This is a replevin action based on two security agreements. Judgment was entered for plaintiff. Defendant’s assignments of error are: (1) That plaintiff was erroneously permitted to amend its petition by substituting a duplicate copy of the security agreement; (2) that parol evidence of an agreement for further credit was wrongfully excluded; and (3) that there was a material alteration of the security agreement. We affirm the judgment of the district court.
The first security agreement was executed in duplicate and a copy retained by each party. The agreement, as signed by the defendant R. W.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Phillips v. Sipsey Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Mazanec v. Lincoln Bonding and Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DrawbaughNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Singer v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
- Pekin Plow Co. v. WilsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Community Bank v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re Continental Resources Corporation, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. SwansonNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Peacock v. Farmers and Merchants BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Antrim v. McMurreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.