Legal Opinion
Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 11, 1970PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.
Plaintiff is the widow of a workman who died from heart disease which she claims arose out of and in the course of deceased’s employment.
The hearing officer, the Workmen’s Compensation Board, and the circuit court, successively rejected the claim and on this de novo appeal we are reviewing the record in accordance with the requirements of ORS 656.301, which provides that our scope of review shall be the same as that of the circuit court. ORS 656.298(6) provides:
“The circuit court review shall be by a judge, without a jury, on the entire record forwarded by the board. The judge may remand the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hannan v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- Hannan v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- Coday v. WILLAMETTE TUG & BARGE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Clayton v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Mayes v. State Compensation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Mansfield v. CAPLENER BROTHERSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- Summit v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Buster v. Chase Bag Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Cardwell v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.