Legal Opinion

Mayes v. State Compensation Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 21, 1969PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

This ease presents the difficult question of whether a heart attack sustained by a workman arose out of and in the course of his employment. ORS 656.002(6).

The Supreme Court has had occasion to consider this problem in four recent cases: Clayton v. Compensation Dept., 253 Or 397, 454 P2d 628 (1969); Coday v. Willamette Tug & Barge, 250 Or 39, 440 P2d 224 (1968); Grandell v. Roseburg Lbr. Co., 251 Or 88, 444 P2d 944 (1968); Olson v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 222 Or 407, 352 P2d 1096 (1960).

From these decisions we conclude that the rules which govern this class of case are the following:(1) The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coday v. WILLAMETTE TUG & BARGE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Clayton v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Olson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Grandell v. ROSEBURG LUMBER COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mize v. Comcast Corp-AT & T BroadbandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. Anderson v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. Summit v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. Cardwell v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API