Mayes v. State Compensation Department
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
This ease presents the difficult question of whether a heart attack sustained by a workman arose out of and in the course of his employment. ORS 656.002(6).
The Supreme Court has had occasion to consider this problem in four recent cases: Clayton v. Compensation Dept., 253 Or 397, 454 P2d 628 (1969); Coday v. Willamette Tug & Barge, 250 Or 39, 440 P2d 224 (1968); Grandell v. Roseburg Lbr. Co., 251 Or 88, 444 P2d 944 (1968); Olson v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 222 Or 407, 352 P2d 1096 (1960).
From these decisions we conclude that the rules which govern this class of case are the following:(1) The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coday v. WILLAMETTE TUG & BARGE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Clayton v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Olson v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Grandell v. ROSEBURG LUMBER COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mize v. Comcast Corp-AT & T BroadbandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- Anderson v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- Summit v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Cardwell v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.