Legal Opinion

Florey v. Meeker

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1952PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

The plaintiffs in this suit are three cousins of Clarence A. Meeker, deceased. In a joint and mutual will executed by Mr. Meeker and his wife, pursuant to contract, the plaintiffs were named, together with two other cousins of Mr. Meeker, as legatees to five-eighths of the surviving testator’s residuary estate. They brought suit to compel specific performance of the will contract insofar as they claim it provided for them under Article VIII. From an adverse decree in the circuit court, they appeal.

Clarence A. Meeker and his wife, Minnie, were married in 1910. Although no children were born of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Rastetter v. . HoenningerNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Frazier v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  3. In Re Shepherd's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Beach v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Stevens v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1912

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Farmers Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. n.sidney Nyhus v. Travel Management CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  3. Mail-Well Envelope Company v. SaleyOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. TMG Life Insurance v. AshnerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  5. Farrington's Owners' Ass'n v. Conway Lake Resorts, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API