Legal Opinion

Haines v. Clark

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1949Published

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

Defendant assigns error in the court’s instructions to the jury on the issue addressed to the amount, if any, plaintiff was entitled to recover of the defendant. On this issue the court charged the jury as follows: “There is no controversy about that, gentlemen. The defendant does not deny the amount claimed by the plaintiff. He says he owes the plaintiff nothing, that there was not any contract, and that he owes him nothing. Gentlemen, the court instructs you that if you answer the first issue yes, and you find the evidence of the plaintiff to be true, that you would answer this third issue…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phillips v. GilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. Phillips v. . GilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. East Coast Fertilizer Co. v. HardeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API