Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Potter
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided January 29, 1998No. Civ.A. 94-4932PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LIFLAND, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment regarding defendant’s entitlement to insurance benefits under an ERISA plan underwritten by plaintiff. For the reasons set forth herein, both motions will be denied.
BACKGROUND
On October 17, 1994, plaintiff, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (hereinafter “plaintiff’), commenced this action against defendant, David Potter (hereinafter “defendant”) seeking declaratory relief and restitution of an alleged overpayment of benefits paid to defendant pursuant to the AT & T Life Insurance Program for…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Maria H. Pinto v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- LaAsmar v. Phelps Dodge Corp. Life, Accidental Death & Dismemberment & Dependent Life Insurance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- West v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001
- McGillivray v. Life Ins. Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Eckelberry v. ReliaStar Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.