Parham v. Harris-Onaxis (In re Harris-Onaxis)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROBERT E. BRIZENDINE, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant-Debtors’ motion as renewed to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint. Following a joint telephone status conference, the parties agreed that this adversary proceeding could be submitted to the Court for decision based on the pleadings of record, including the question of the preclusive effect of a prior state *912court judgment serving as the basis of Plaintiffs’ claim. Therefore, the Court will also address Plaintiffs’ motion for…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Navy Federal Credit Union v. Purse (In re Purse)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2015