Legal Opinion

Basil v. Vincello

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1990No. 89-67PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

The question presented is whether a general judgment creditor may satisfy the unpaid balance of a judgment lien by marshaling a lien against a parcel of property that the debtor conveyed to a third party by means of a defectively executed deed.

The rights and status of the parties must first be defined.

I

Perrico and Slowey paid $50,887 to Vincello and Teague on April 25, 1979. In exchange Vincello and Teague were to execute a quitclaim deed transferring ownership of the property known as Parcel No. 2. Such deeds have the force and effect of a deed in fee simple to the grantee when duly executed…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Goldberger v. Bexley PropertiesOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Reilly v. GriffithNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  5. University Hills, Inc. v. Robert H. Patton, Bert Maxwell, Jr. And Layton A. HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Treinish v. Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. (In Re Periandri)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. Slone v. Lassiter (In Re Grove-Merritt)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
  3. Cincinnati Entertainment Associates, Ltd. v. Hamilton County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Hurst v. Enterprise Title Agency, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. JPMorgan Chase Bank v. LigginsOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API