Legal Opinion
City of Trenton v. Lenzner
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 22, 1954Published
1Opinion of the Court
16 N.J. 465 (1954)
109 A.2d 409
CITY OF TRENTON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ISADORE LENZNER AND FREDA LENZNER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PRINCETON, EXR. OF THE EST. OF JOHN S. VAN NEST, MORTGAGEE, WILLIAM EARDLEY, SOL BRODER, ROY ADAMS, MICHAEL CUNNINGHAM AND FRED BARTEL, TENANTS, DEFENDANTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Reargued September 8, 1954.
Decided November 22, 1954.
Messrs. John A. Hartpence and David Frankel argued the cause for the appellants.
Mr. Louis Josephson argued the cause for the respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, J.
The Appellate…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Cincinnati v. VesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- City of Cincinnati v. Vester. Same v. Richards Same v. ReakirtSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.