Legal Opinion
Four D's, Inc. v. Mattera
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 23, 1991No. 9530PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether, under the terms of an agreement to convey certain real estate located in Norwalk, the proposed corporate purchaser met its contractual obligations. The defendants also claim that the trial court improperly (1) accepted the trial referee’s recommended award of damages, (2) failed to render a decision on their motion for a mistrial and (3) refused to correct the referee’s findings of fact. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are necessary to our discussion of these issues. In a written agreement signed by the defendants,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dills v. Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Griffin v. Nationwide Moving & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Wilcox Trucking, Inc. v. Mansour Builders, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Riccio v. AbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Allen v. NissleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Foley v. Huntington Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Rosick v. Equipment Maintenance & Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Spicer v. SpicerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Allapattah Services, Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
- ABINGTON, LLC v. Town of AvonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.