Legal Opinion

People v. Frazer

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 2003No. D037855PublishedCited by 13 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HALLER, J.

Anthony Lewis Frazer was convicted of eight counts of robbery based on the robbery of two stores where eight employees were present. He contends the judgment should be reversed because (1) a special instruction given to the jury removed the elements of possession and immediate presence for robbery when the victim was an employee; (2) the jury was not presented with the theory of an employee’s constructive possession of the employer’s property; and (3) there was insufficient evidence that nonmanagerial employee victims constructively possessed the stolen property. He also…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. California v. RamosSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. People v. SmitheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. DeFranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. People v. NeelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API