People v. Scott
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, C. J.
We granted review to resolve a conflict in the Courts of Appeal concerning whether, for purposes of the offense of robbery, all employees have constructive possession of the employer’s property while on duty and thus may be separate victims of a robbery of the employer’s business, assuming the other elements of robbery are met as to each employee. In the present case, the Court of Appeal concluded the trial court did not err in informing the jury, in response to its question, that all employees on duty during a robbery have constructive possession of their employer’s…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. EstesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- People v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. CovarrubiasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- State of Iowa v. Randy Mitchell CopenhaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- People v. NeelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.