Legal Opinion

United States v. Gerald John Bermingham

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 11, 1988No. 1252, Docket 88-1025PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents an important issue in the administration of the new sentencing guidelines, an issue that will have major significance for all federal trial and appellate courts if the sentencing guidelines ultimately withstand constitutional challenge. See United States v. Johnson, 682 F.Supp. 1033 (W.D.Mo.1988), cert. granted sub nom. United States v. Mistretta, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2818, 100 L.Ed.2d 920 (1988). The issue is whether, and under what circumstances, a dispute as to which of two guideline ranges should apply to a defendant may be left unresolved…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Barnes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hicks v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. Rev. Alberto Mejias, A/K/A Rev. Angel OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. Sada Vargas, A/K/A Zaida HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Kikumura, YuCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Ruben Ortiz, A/K/A Ruben Ortiz De Jesus, United States of America v. Felix Nunez, A/K/A Felix Nunez MolinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Tracey Donell White, United States of America v. Clarence JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API