Legal Opinion

United States v. Sada Vargas, A/K/A Zaida Hernandez

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 11, 1980No. 257, Docket 79-1198PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKES, Circuit Judge:

This appeal from conviction on substantive and conspiracy charges raises a question under Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 66 S.Ct. 1180, 90 L.Ed. 1489 (1946), about some of the trial court’s instructions possibly relating to the substantive count. The case also calls into question applicability of the “concurrent sentence” doctrine, since appellant was sentenced by the United States District Court for the Southern District Of New York, John M. Cannella, Judge, to concurrent terms of three years’ imprisonment on Counts One (conspiracy to violate federal narcotics…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Joseph Gelb v. Royal Globe Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. AlessiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. Walter Sanders v. James E. Sullivan and Robert Abrams, the Attorney General of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Hilda Escobar De BrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. Leslie Anderson and Leonard MooneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API