Legal Opinion
Cellular Information Systems, Inc. v. Broz
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided May 8, 1995No. Civ. A. 14094PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEN, Chancellor.
The claim asserted is for usurpation of a corporate opportunity. As described below, a curious circumstance renders the factual context of the claim unique. The opportunity allegedly usurped is a chance to acquire certain assets from Mackinac Cellular Corporation, most importantly a license granted by the Federal Communications Commission to build and operate a cellular telecommunications system on the eastern tip of Michigan’s upper peninsula, an area designated Michigan 2 RSA. Plaintiff is Cellular Information Systems, Inc. (“CIS”), a Delaware corporation engaged…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
- David J. Greene & Co. v. Dunhill International, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1968
- Fender v. PrescottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Fender v. PrescottNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Abbott Redmont Thinlite Corporation v. Rudolph R. Redmont and Circle Redmont CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Broz v. Cellular Information Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Christopher Ropko v. Phillip McNeill, Jr.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2026
- Ridgewood Manor II, Inc. v. The Delaware Manufactured Home Relocation AuthorityCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014