Legal Opinion

Pace v. DiGuglielmo

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 27, 2005No. 03-9627PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

544 U.S. 408 (2005)

PACE

v.

DiGUGLIELMO, SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT GRATERFORD, et al.

No. 03-9627.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued February 28, 2005.

Decided April 27, 2005.

REHNQUIST, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which O'CONNOR, SCALIA, KENNEDY, and THOMAS, JJ., joined. STEVENS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which SOUTER, GINSBURG, and BREYER, JJ., joined, post, p. 419.

David W. Wycoff argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Billy H. Nolas and Maureen Kearney Rowley.

Ronald Eisenberg argued the cause for respondents. With him on…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Rehnquist; Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Freddy Curiel v. Amy MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. (HC) Beasley v. McDowellDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  3. (HC) Donovan v. DiazDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. (HC) Earle v. ShermanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. (HC) Harris v. FrauenheimDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API