Legal Opinion
Kay Berry, Inc. v. Pearman (In Re Pearman)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 23, 2010No. 19-12033PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KATHRYN C. FERGUSON, Bankruptcy Judge.
Kay Berry, Inc. (“Kay Berry”) filed a complaint against the Debtor, Therese Pearman, seeking to exclude an unliquidat-ed debt owed by Ms. Pearman from her discharge. Count II of the Complaint seeks to liquidate the damages owed to Kay Berry, Inc., including seeking an award of costs and attorneys fees incurred in connection with the defense of the Copyright Action pursuant to § 505 of the Copyright Act. See, 17 U.S.C. § 505. In Count I, the Complaint seeks to except any resulting debt from discharge pursuant to § 523(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- In Re Jesse H. Long, Debtor. Barclays American/business Credit, Inc. v. Jesse H. LongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- In Re David Louis Cohn, Debtor. Insurance Company of North America v. David Louis CohnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- In Re Dominick P. CONTE, Debtor, Dominick P. CONTE, Appellant v. Urmila GAUTAM; Narinder Gautam; U.S. Trustee, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marko v. CarpenaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- Marko v. NatrachviliUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2022