Legal Opinion

McElveen & Hardage v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 9, 1899PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Reagan. Pike superior court. April term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtLittle, J.

McElveen & Hardage instituted an action against the Southern Railway Company. One part of the petition clearly shows that it was sought to recover the value of certain goods shipped by them, under the provisions of sections 2317 and 2318 of the Civil Code, making it the duty of the initial carrier, on notice, to trace lost, damaged, or destroyed goods, when in order to reach destination the freight must be transported by two or more common carriers of a connecting line. The defendant filed a demurrer, which the court sustained, to a part of the petition, leaving the case to proceed as an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Snow v. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Central Railroad v. HasselkusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. ShomoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  4. Western and Atlantic Railroad v. Ohio Valley Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  5. Bedell v. Richmond & Danville R. R.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Seattle Grain Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. LukeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  3. Inman & Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1908
  4. Jackson v. ThomCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  5. Carr v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API