Central Railroad v. Hasselkus
Supreme Court of Georgia
“'Before Judge • Boynton. Spalding superior court. February adjourned term, 1892. C
1Opinion of the Court
Simmons, Justice.
1. The action was for damages to fruit from delay in transportation. The plaintiffs recovered, and the defendant moved for a new trial, which was refused, audit excepted. The shipments were made from Griffin, Ga., on the defendant’s line of railroad, under hills of lading issued by the defendant, which were headed : “ Central Railroad and Banking Company, and connections. Through Bill of Lading,” and which stated that the fruit was received in apparent good order and condition, consigned to certain named parties in New Tork and Philadelphia, to be transported by the defendant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Martin v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Liljengren Furniture & Lumber Co. v. MeadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Snow v. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Stange v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Driver v. FordIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hawkins v. StuddardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Southern Express Co. v. HanawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Forrester v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Southern Railway Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.