Legal Opinion

Federal Kemper Insurance v. Schneider

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 4, 1984No. 55, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

Baseball has its designated hitters and the insurance industry has its designated insureds. The question before us is whether appellee William Joseph Schneider falls within the latter category for purposes of uninsured motorist coverage under a family automobile policy issued to his mother, Shirley A. Schneider, by appellant Federal Kemper Insurance Company. We are constrained to hold that appellee William strikes out. But before explaining the reasons for our call, we must address a procedural problem produced by Md.Rule 605 a.

Rule 605 a

As the titling of this appeal shows,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. GartelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. Canaras v. Lift Truck Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Truck Insurance Exchange v. Marks Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Eastgate Associates v. ApperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Sigma Reproductive Health Center v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United Services Auto. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund v. BaxterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. Smith v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API