Legal Opinion

Holt Hauling & Warehousing Systems, Inc. v. Aronow Roofing Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 1983No. 2082PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Holt Hauling and Warehousing Systems, Inc. (Holt) has appealed from an order dismissing an action in assumpsit against Aronow Roofing Company (Aronow) on grounds that the court lacked “in personam jurisdiction over [Aro*160now].” The action was commenced by the issuance of a summons served on Aronow by certified mail, return receipt requested, directed to Aronow’s office and principal place of business in Camden, New Jersey. Aronow is a New Jersey corporation. Holt is a Pennsylvania corporation with principal place of business in Gloucester, New Jersey. These facts are contained in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Monaco v. Montgomery Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. LUITWEILER v. Northchester Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Stein v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Alumbaugh v. Wallace Business Forms, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Szekely v. Abilene Flour Mills Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Deyarmin v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Ambrose v. Cross Creek CondominiumsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. v. Urban Partnership, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Gale v. Mercy Catholic Medical Center Eastwick, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Schmitt v. Seaspray-Sharkline, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API