Legal Opinion

Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvana Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 11, 1948No. Appeal, 249PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

For many years Duquesne Light Company (which we will refer to as the Company) has furnished a complete street lighting service to the City of Pittsburgh under rate S of its established tariff applicable to such municipal service. The rate is a composite or “package” rate which combines the furnishing and the lighting of lamps throughout the City with nightly inspection and replacement, at unit charges. Specific additional monthly charges, by way of rental or otherwise, were made by the Company for various types of fixtures, brackets, poles, underground supply lines and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lindheimer v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Carpenter v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. ARIZONA CORPORATION COM'NArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Orlosky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Latrobe Bus Service v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API