Legal Opinion
Arbitration Between Raymond v. Allied Property & Casualty Insurance
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 30, 1996No. C5-95-2251PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
Respondent Linda Raymond was awarded wage loss and medical expense benefits in an arbitration proceeding pursuant to the No-Fault Act. Appellant Allied Property & Casualty Insurance Company filed a motion in district court to vacate the arbitration award on grounds that the arbitrator exceeded its authority by awarding Raymond no-fault benefits while her workers’ compensation claim was pending. The district court denied Allied’s motion. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Linda K. Raymond was injured in an automobile accident while she was in Fargo, North Dakota being treated for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Record v. Metropolitan Transit CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Metropolitan Transit Commission v. Bachman'sSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Klinefelter v. Crum & Forster Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- American Family Insurance Group v. UdermannCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Arbitration Between Racine v. AMCO Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- State Farm Insurance Companies v. Jolene WuorenmaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015