Legal Opinion

United Healthcare Insurance v. Davis

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 31, 2010No. 08-30001PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*622E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents questions relating to the dormant Commerce Clause and the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution. The district court granted a permanent injunction enjoining the implementation of La. R.S. § 42:802.1 (“Act 479” or “the Act”), on the basis that it violated the dormant Commerce Clause, because it effectively favored Louisiana insurance companies in bidding for health insurance coverage for state employees. However, the district court held that the Act did not violate the Contract Clause by interfering with the plaintiffs’ contracts…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  4. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. TRI-M GROUP, LLC v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  2. National Solid Wastes Management Ass'n v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2012
  3. TF-Harbor, LLC v. City of RockwallDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
  4. TRI-M GROUP, LLC v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  5. AbbVie Inc v. LandryDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2024

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API