Legal Opinion

Thomas v. General Telephone Directory Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 1983No. Docket 65605PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals by leave granted from the trial court’s order denying defendant’s motion for summary or accelerated judgment.

Plaintiff, a locksmith, filed a complaint against defendant, alleging that it committed "simple negligence” and, alternatively, "willful, wanton and gross conduct [sic]” inasmuch as defendant listed plaintiff’s advertisement in the yellow pages of defendant’s telephone directory under "Loans” rather than "Locksmiths”.

Defendant moved for summary or accelerated judgment. It asked for accelerated judgment, pursuant to GCR 1963, 116.1(2), on the ground that the Public…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Valentine v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Harbaugh v. Citizens Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Muskegon Agency, Inc. v. General Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Muskegon Agency, Inc. v. General Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Hunter v. General Telephone Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rinaldo's Construction Corp. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Travelers Insurance v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp. v. McKinnon, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985
  4. Tommy Helms and Ken Helms v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. Stark Steel Corp. v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API