Porphyry Paving Co. v. Ancker
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, and from an order denying a • new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
Action to enforce a street assessment against defendant’s land situate in the city of San Ber-nardino. The judgment of the lower court was in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant has appealed therefrom, and from an order denying a new trial.
1. Appellant contends that the court erred in overruling his demurrer to the complaint on the grounds that it does not state a cause of action, and that it is ambiguous and contradictory.
The complaint appears to be neither ambiguous nor contradictory; and I think it states a cause of action. But it is contended by counsel for appellant…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hart v. PlumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gay v. EngebretsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- California Improvement Co. v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Yuma County Water Users' Assn. v. SchlechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Dudley v. Superior Court, Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1910
- State ex rel. Warnick v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.