Legal Opinion
Motorola, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided June 10, 1968No. Civ 6906 PHXPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
MUECKE, District Judge.
We have before us: (1) Motorola’s Petition for Order Quashing or Modifying Demand for Access to Evidence and Compliance to Give Testimony Under Oath, (2) Motion to Vacate Notice of Deposition of Vicente T. Ximenes made by Respondent, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and (3) Respondent’s Motion to Amend the Commissioner’s Charge.
Briefly, the facts are that on October 21, 1968, two documents were served at 8201 East McDowell Road, Scottsdale, Arizona, on Rufus Coulter, Western Area Director of Personnel for Motorola, Inc. One document consisted of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Royal Palm Ice Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Local Number 104, Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1969
3Cited by5 opinions
- Loo v. GerargeDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1974
- MOTOROLA, INC., an Illinois Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- 7 Fair empl.prac.cas. 482, 7 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9157 Pacific Maritime Association and California Stevedore and Ballast Co. v. Frank A. Quinn, as an Individual and Frank A. Quinn, as Regional Director of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local 34 v. Frank A. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1976
- Pacific Maritime Ass'n v. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974