Legal Opinion

Wiley v. Baumgardner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1884No. 11,214PublishedCited by 32 opinions

From the Wells Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, C.

The complaint, in an action brought by theappellees against the appellant, consisted of a number of paragraphs, to all of which except the third demurrers were sus-' tained. A demurrer to the third paragraph for want of sufficient facts was overruled. This ruling alone is assigned as error.

*67The action was upon a contract in writing, by which the appellant sold to the appellees the former’s entire stock of dry goods, boots and shoes, merchandise and fixtures in his store in Bluffton, at cost, less a certain per cent., and agreed to transfer to them his lease on the building occupied by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peltz v. EicheleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. Beard v. DennisIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Harrison v. LockhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Rakestraw v. LanierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Donahue v. Permacel Tape Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Licocci v. Cardinal Associates, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Seach v. Richards, Dieterle & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Hood v. LeggSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API