Legal Opinion

Cincinnati & Martinsville Railroad v. Eaton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Johnson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, C. J.

This was an action by the appellee against the appellant, to recover damages for the killing of the deceased, William Danly, by a locomotive engine, upon the appellant’s railroad.

There were three paragraphs in the complaint, to each of which separate demurrers wmre filed, for want of sufficient facts. The demurrer was sustained to the second paragraph, but overruled as to the first and third, and the defendant excepted. Issues were joined, and the cause tried by a jury, resulting in a general verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

Error is assigned upon the overruling of the demurrer to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. GoldsmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad Haute v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Lafayette & Indianapolis Railroad v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Higgins v. Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. HedgesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Huey v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Pennsylvania Co. v. SinclairIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API