Legal Opinion
Lubetzky v. Friedman
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 31, 1988No. B026111PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Plaintiff Richard Lubetzky appeals from a February 13, 1987, order denying in part his motion to tax costs on appeal. For the reasons discussed below, we modify the order and affirm it as modified.
Procedural Background
Plaintiff filed a complaint on July 10, 1984, and on January 22, 1985, he filed a first amended complaint against the following named defendants: Robert Friedman, Erving Friedman, Monica Friedman, Ariel Ganezer, Charles J. Weissberg, and Friedman Roofing Co., Inc., a California corporation. The first amended complaint alleged 11 causes of action in tort. Later,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Sime v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Snoddy v. McNairSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ralph's Chrysler-Plymouth v. New Car Dealers Policy & Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Wilson v. Board of Retirement of Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lubetzky v. FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991