Legal Opinion

Huynh v. Ingersoll-Rand

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 17, 1993No. B067825PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

In this case, a worker sued the manufacturer of a hand-held power grinder which severely injured his eye. The trial court granted summary judgment on grounds the grinder was “misused” by attaching the wrong disc to the machine. We reverse because the defendant failed to sustain its burden of proving the “misuse” caused the injury or of demonstrating the manufacturer provided an adequate warning against this potential dangerous mismatch of components.

Facts and Proceedings Below

In September 1987, appellant Jones T. Huynh applied for a position as a welder at Southwest Marine,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Canifax v. Hercules Powder Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Balido v. Improved MacHinery, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Gomez v. TicorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Self v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re Air Crash Disaster.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Conte v. Wyeth, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Chavez v. Glock, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Consumer Cause, Inc. v. SmilecareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API