Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Killian

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 25, 1973No. 43720PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants Robert W. Killian and Lorraine Killian appeal from the denial of their motion for a new trial. They argue that a new trial is required on the grounds that the evidence does not justify the verdict, that the court erred in permitting plaintiffs to reopen their case in chief to provide additional foundation testimony, and that the final argument of plaintiffs’ counsel was prejudicial. We affirm.

Plaintiffs were injured in a head-on automobile collision which occurred on November 8, 1969, on County Road No. 28 in Mille Lacs County. The driver of the other vehicle, Darrell Wester-lund,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CaseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Lerner v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Walton v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Montpetit v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. In re the Estate of RuttCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  4. King v. LarsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Security State Bank of Howard Lake v. DieltzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API