Legal Opinion

George LaCava & Sons, Inc. v. Town Plan & Zoning Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 9, 1966PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.

The plaintiff is the owner of eight acres of land located well toward the center of a very large area of Rocky Hill which is subject to what are designated as village residence zoning restrictions. These restrictions permit the use of land for single-family dwellings, farms, orchards, nurseries, agriculture, roadside stands for produce raised on the land, customary home occupations, places of worship, nonprofit schools and colleges, nursery schools, community or nonprofit club buildings, passenger transportation stations, or public utility substations. Rocky Hill Zoning Regs. §§ 3.11, 3.12…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kutcher v. Town Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. Zieky v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  3. Lupinacci v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  4. Zygmont v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  5. Steiner, Inc. v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. DeMaria v. Enfield Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  2. Rocchi v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  3. Langer v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. Samp Mortar Lake Co. v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  5. Bora v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API