Legal Opinion

Samp Mortar Lake Co. v. Town Plan & Zoning Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 6, 1967PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas dismissing the plaintiff’s appeal from a decision of the defendant commission changing the zonal classification of the plaintiff’s property, which consists of nine-tenths of an acre on the southeast corner of Samp Mortar Drive and Brookside Drive in Fairfield, from industrial to residence A. The property was the only industrial lot in a large residential section of Fairfield and is the residual piece remaining to the plaintiff after it had subdivided and developed all the surrounding area, where it built approximately 500…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. HillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  2. Summ v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  3. Corsino v. GroverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  4. Dooley v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  5. Corthouts v. Town of NewingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. First Hartford Realty Corp. v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  2. Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Chevron Oil Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. Brecciaroli v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. Port Clinton Associates v. Board of SelectmenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API