Legal Opinion

Kraz, LLC v. Branch Banking & Trust Co. (In re Kraz, LLC)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

Decided April 18, 2017No. Case No. 8:15-bk-07039-MGW; Adv. No. 8:15-ap-00655-MGWPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Michael G. Williamson, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge

A shared loss agreement is a classic •win-win. Under the typical shared loss agreement, the FDIC absorbs 80% of the losses on a failed bank’s assets that are acquired by another bank. By absorbing a significant portion of the acquiring bank’s losses, the FDIC is able to sell distressed assets without steep risk discounts, increasing the distressed assets’ net present value. In exchange for backstopping an acquiring bank’s losses, the FDIC requires the acquiring bank to engage in prudent loan…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Ethan Allen, Inc. v. Georgetown ManorSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  3. American Honda Motor Co. v. Motorcycle Information Network, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
  4. In Re Safety Harbor Resort and SpaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
  5. FERGUSON TRANS. v. North American Van Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Namal Enterprises, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
  2. E-Z Cashing, LLC v. FerryDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API