Legal Opinion

In re Namal Enterprises, LLC

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

Decided September 15, 2017No. Case No. 8:16-bk-07190-MGWPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Michael G. Williamson, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge

In its first bankruptcy case, the Debtor confirmed a plan that expressly acknowledged that the Debtor owed TD Bank, which held a mortgage on the Debtor’s property, $2,001,929.63 on the parties’ loan. Although the Debtor was only obligated to pay TD Bank $1.4 million under the plan in the Debtor’s first case, that plan provided that TD Bank would be owed the full $2,001,929.63 (less any payments made under the plan) in the event the Debtor defaulted on its plan payments. But when the Debtor…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Parsons Steel, Inc. v. First Alabama BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re LesterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2019
  2. 2408 W Kennedy LLC v. Bank of Central Florida, a Florida Banking CorporaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2022
  3. McGee v. World Business Lenders, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API