In re Namal Enterprises, LLC
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Michael G. Williamson, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge
In its first bankruptcy case, the Debtor confirmed a plan that expressly acknowledged that the Debtor owed TD Bank, which held a mortgage on the Debtor’s property, $2,001,929.63 on the parties’ loan. Although the Debtor was only obligated to pay TD Bank $1.4 million under the plan in the Debtor’s first case, that plan provided that TD Bank would be owed the full $2,001,929.63 (less any payments made under the plan) in the event the Debtor defaulted on its plan payments. But when the Debtor…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Parsons Steel, Inc. v. First Alabama BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re LesterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2019
- 2408 W Kennedy LLC v. Bank of Central Florida, a Florida Banking CorporaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2022
- McGee v. World Business Lenders, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2023