Legal Opinion
First State Bank of Medford v. United States
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 13, 1958No. Civ. 565PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, Chief Judge.
The above-entitled cause came before the Court for trial without a jury.
This suit was brought to determine the ownership of $2,500 on deposit with the Clerk of the District Court of Dodge County, Minnesota. The dispute arises by reason of the following facts and circumstances.
Some time prior to June, 1954, Kenneth W. Hammann and Harvey L. Hustad formed a partnership doing business as Owatonna Trenching Service (hereinafter called Owatonna or the partnership). Owatonna entered an oral agreement with Underground Constructors, Inc. (hereinafter called Underground) to perform…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Security Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. AcriSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Waddill, Holland & Flinn, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. L. C. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- United States of America, in Intervention-Appellee v. Crest Finance Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- Randall v. ColbyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1961
- Sams v. New Kensington City Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Arthur Company v. Chicago Paints, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.