Legal Opinion
Arthur Company v. Chicago Paints, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 18, 1959No. 5-58 Civ. 79PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
This proceeding, commenced in the Northern District of Ohio and venue transferred here, is in the nature of a' bill of interpleader 1 to determine which of several claimants is entitled to the sum of $9,071.13 paid by plaintiff into the registry of the Court.
Defendants have answered and each of them claim they are entitled to all or a part of said sum, excepting Northland Paint Company, which alleges the United States has priority. Following joinder of issues and by agreement of the parties the action as to plaintiff was dismissed.
The United States has intervened 2…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. ScovilSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. R. F. Ball Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. White Bear Brewing Co., Inc. Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Juragua Iron Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. L. C. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- United States of America, in Intervention-Appellee v. Crest Finance Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- Randall v. ColbyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1961
- Elliott v. Sioux Oil CompanyDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1960