Legal Opinion
Schneider v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided October 29, 1997No. 06-96-00097-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Grant, Justice.
Harry Paul Schneider was convicted of a felony offense and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment after a jury found that he delivered by offering to sell one kilogram of crack cocaine to an undercover police officer, H.C. Riddle, in violation of Texas Controlled Substances Act, 1 Sec. 481.112.
In his first three points of error, Schneider contends that his conviction is void (1) because Section 481.112 is unconstitutionally vague where the prosecution is for delivery by offer to sell and the Act fails to define the term “offer”; (2) because Section 481.112 violates…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Ex Parte WelbornCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Roscol Hines v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2012
- In re M.A.H.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Shook v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Albert Alexander v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.