Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Bronfin

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1951No. 1045PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

This appeal brings for review the action of the trial court in granting a motion for a directed verdict for the defendants at the conclusion of the opening statement to the jury by plaintiff’s counsel. In his opening statement counsel stated that plaintiff expected to prove that she, a housewife, was a regular customer of a market or grocery store operated by defendants; that defendants advertised free delivery of purchases and plaintiff had availed herself of this service on various occasions, making her order by telephone and paying for the purchases on delivery; that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McCrink v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Henderson v. Nolting First Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Hall v. SmathersNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Park Transfer Co. v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  5. Grimes v. B. F. Saul Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Di Cosala v. KaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Griffin v. Acacia Life InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Phelan v. City of Mount RainierDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Horridge v. St. Mary's County Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Welsh Manufacturing, Division of Textron, Inc. v. Pinkerton's, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API