Legal Opinion
Mallory v. O'NEIL
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 5, 1954PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
69 So.2d 313 (1954)
MALLORY
v.
O'NEIL.
Supreme Court of Florida. Division A.
January 5, 1954.
Russell C. Gay, Sibley Efronson and Cushman, Gay & Woodard, Miami, for appellants.
Blackwell, Walker & Gray, Miami, for appellee.
TERRELL, Justice.
This appeal is from a final judgment dismissing appellant's second amended complaint, so the only question with which we are confronted is whether or not the complaint is sufficient to state a cause of action
It sets up what the pleader elects to call three causes of action. (1) Ratification of the act of a servant by his principal. (2) Negligence of defendant in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Weiss v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- R. L. Stinson & East Coast Lumber Co. v. PrevattSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
- Williams v. HinesSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Hall v. SmathersNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- International Shoe Co. v. HewittSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Ramon A. Mercado v. City of OrlandoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Di Cosala v. KaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Ponticas v. K.M.S. InvestmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Malicki v. DoeSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Garcia v. DuffyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.