Swank v. Liquidators
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.
Plaintiff, by her second amended complaint, upon which this, action was tried, sought specific performance of a contract for the conveyance of real estate, alleging in her complaint that defendant was an Oregon corporation, that Prank H. Reeves was its duly authorized agent and as such executed on defendant’s behalf a written memorandum as follows:
“December 13,1928.
“N% of NE% of Sec. 34 (continuing with description of property).
“Will give q. c. deed for $450. Cash in 10 days.
“Liquidators, By Frank H. Reeves, Atty.”
Plaintiff alleged her acceptance of this offer and a subsequent tender on her…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cossitt v. HobbsIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Frahm v. MetcalfNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Le Marinel v. BachWashington Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grant v. AuvilWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Lager v. BerggrenWashington Supreme Court · 1936