Legal Opinion

Swank v. Liquidators

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1930No. 22621. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Plaintiff, by her second amended complaint, upon which this, action was tried, sought specific performance of a contract for the conveyance of real estate, alleging in her complaint that defendant was an Oregon corporation, that Prank H. Reeves was its duly authorized agent and as such executed on defendant’s behalf a written memorandum as follows:

“December 13,1928.
“N% of NE% of Sec. 34 (continuing with description of property).
“Will give q. c. deed for $450. Cash in 10 days.
“Liquidators, By Frank H. Reeves, Atty.”

Plaintiff alleged her acceptance of this offer and a subsequent tender on her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cossitt v. HobbsIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Frahm v. MetcalfNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Le Marinel v. BachWashington Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grant v. AuvilWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Lager v. BerggrenWashington Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API