Legal Opinion

Tevis v. Hammersmith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1908No. 21,254PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From Washington Circuit Court; Perry E. Bear, Special Judge. Suit by John Tevis against Louis Hammersmith and others. From a decree for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under el. 2, §1394 Burns 1908, Acts 1901, p. 565, §10.

1Opinion of the CourtGillett, J.

This is a second appeal. See Tevis v. Hammersmith (1903), 31 Ind. App. 281. The suit was brought by appellant on behalf of the Home Crystal Water Company, to recover the value of a certain lot of iron water-pipe sold by appellee Peter Arlund, the president of said company. The purchasers, whom appellant’s brief states are the real defendants in said case, were appellees Gheens, Bush and Parker.

*2881. *287The first question arises out of the refusal of the trial *288court to make a special finding. The cause was tried at the June term, 1905, of the court below, and at the commencement of the trial counsel…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hudelson v. HudelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Moran v. HorskySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Fudge v. MarquellIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Hartlep v. ColeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Hill v. NisbetIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Rosenfeld v. Schwitzer CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  3. Delaney v. GubbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. In RE ANNEXATION ETC. v. City of AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Pontiac Packing Co. v. HancockMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API